Skip to content

Cookies 🍪

This site uses cookies that need consent.

Learn more

Zur Powderguide-Startseite Zur Powderguide-Startseite
news

Whistler Blackcomb: An environmental nerd?!

Whistler is committed to environmental protection. What is behind it?

by Lisa Amenda 02/13/2018
Combating climate change and stopping the melting of glaciers: These are the ambitious goals of Whistler Blackcomb. But can one of the largest ski resorts in the world reduce its impact on climate change without sacrificing its economic interests?

There are these ski resorts. The resorts that you remember from the first ski videos. The ones that already stood for freedom, passion and the pure lifestyle of skiing back then. The ones that were virtually synonymous with freeskiing. Powder. And endless backcountry. That you always had at the top of your bucket list - without even knowing what a bucket list actually was. Whistler, or more precisely Whistler Blackcomb, is undoubtedly one of these ski resorts.

As early as 1962, a Vancouver businessman made plans to develop Whistler Mountain as a possible venue for the Winter Olympics. In the course of this, the road network was expanded and after the construction of a 4-seater gondola, a double chairlift, two T-bar lifts and a ski hut, the Whistler ski area was created in 1966. Over the years, the area continued to grow and Blackcomb Mountain opened in 1980. By connecting the two areas in 2008 with the Peak 2 Peak Gondola, Whistler Blackcomb became one of the largest ski resorts in North America. And a place of longing for even more champagne powder lovers.

However, even the largest and most popular ski resort in North America is struggling with the problems of the future and the effects of climate change. "Whistler Blackcomb is embedded in a huge mountain world that is home to a large number of glaciers. These glaciers have allowed us to witness the effects of climate change for many decades," explains Arthur De Jong, Mountain Planning and Environmental Resource Manager at Whistler Blackcomb. "According to weather data from 1976 to 2011, collected by Whistler Blackcomb and Environment Canada, on average the amount of snow is slightly increasing in winter. We've seen the same thing with winter air temperatures - an average of 0.5°C over the last 35 years. Our summer temperatures have even increased by up to 2°C on average over the same period. We have also observed that the glaciers in the area are retreating further and further."

Through these observations, climate change has become an important daily business (and marketing tool?) at Whistler Blackcomb. The aim is to gradually reduce the area's ecological footprint. Even more than that: Whistler Blackcomb has set itself the committed goal of becoming a ski resort with "zero waste, zero carbon and zero net emissions" in the coming years. The resort has already reported its first successes: according to De Jong, around 2.5 million kilowatt hours of energy were saved between 2012 and 2013 and almost 70 percent of waste has been saved since 2000. In addition, Whistler built a hydroelectric power plant on Fitzsimmons Creek below the Peak 2 Peak Gondola in 2010, which covers the ski resort's entire energy requirements, including snow production.

With new, energy-efficient snow cannons on the Horstman Glacier, Whistler also wants to halt glacier retreat on this glacier. This is no coincidence. The glacier is one of two glaciers in North America - along with the Palmer Glacier on Mount Hood in Oregon - that is also used for skiing in summer. Ski teams from all over the world come to Whistler to train during the summer months. Many summer camps for freeskiers are also held there. Permanently installed snow cannons are intended to stop the glacier from melting: From October, the snow produced is intended on the one hand to increase the natural amount of snow and on the other hand to reduce the summer ice melt due to an increased albedo - a similar principle to the white tarpaulins that are laid out in many glacier ski areas in this country. Unfortunately, this has had little effect so far. The glacier continues to recede and in 2017, the legendary summer camp "Camp of Champions" had to be canceled for the first time in 28 years due to the low amount of snow - as there would not have been enough snow for the massive kickers.

In addition, since the takeover by Vail Resorts, Whistler Blackcomb has focused primarily on year-round activities and long-term strategies. As part of the Whistler Blackcomb Renaissance project, for example, a weather-independent indoor adventure and water park is to be created. Vail Resorts is already taking concrete measures this year. With an investment of around 52 million US dollars, three new lifts are being built in the ski resort and the bike park is being expanded by almost 21 kilometers of trails.

A new gondola alone, which will replace the two chairlifts Wizard and Solar in Blackcomb, is set to increase capacity by 47 percent and transport up to 4,000 winter sports enthusiasts per hour. More people than anywhere else in North America. The reasoning behind the construction of this gondola is that it will allow skiers to climb the mountains in even greater comfort and protection from the weather.

When Arthur De Jong talks in an interview about how our thirst for adventure is threatening the environment, that we definitely need to find a way to reduce our recreational footprint and that Whistler Blackcomb has set itself the goal of becoming an industry leader in climate protection, this statement seems almost grotesque in the wake of the latest development plans in Whistler.

Or is it simply consistent? After all, Whistler Blackcomb is a tourist destination. Tourist destinations live from their guests and their satisfaction. Perhaps it was time to modernize the lifts in terms of their energy efficiency?

The fact that new superlatives - such as the longest, continuous lift system - are created in the process is probably part and parcel of a resort of this size. And if Whistler has recognized the problem with winter and snow reliability, it seems only logical to further expand the bike park, if you disregard the land consumption.

So can everything in climate and environmental protection always be seen as black or white, or do you sometimes have to accept compromises? Is Whistler Blackcomb an environmental nerd, or perhaps just a resort that likes to adorn itself with an environmental department? Perhaps we should simply be happy that such a large resort is drawing attention to the effects of climate change. Whether it always does everything right remains to be seen - after all, they say of themselves that others can learn from their successes and failures. And doing something is always better than doing nothing, right? What do you think?

Here you can find Whistler Blackcomb's climate strategy at a glance

.

This article has been automatically translated by DeepL with subsequent editing. If you notice any spelling or grammatical errors or if the translation has lost its meaning, please write an e-mail to the editors.

Show original (German)

Related articles

Comments