Skip to content

Cookies 🍪

This site uses cookies that need consent.

Learn more

Zur Powderguide-Startseite Zur Powderguide-Startseite
gear reviews

Short test | Marker Duke EPF

The Marker Duke Generation 2.0: wider, more colorful and even better?

by Marius Schwager 05/14/2012
"Are those next years bindings?" This question was answered with a resounding "Yes?" at a deep snow day in Tyrol in March 2012. The further development of the classic Marker Duke freeride binding with the EPF suffix made it to the PG editorial team and was thrown into the tough freeride reality impatiently and without further ado.

The abbreviation EPF stands for "Extended Powder Frame". The basic construction of the Marker Duke has remained the same, but the frame and the mounting points have been visibly widened. The minimum ski width with which the Duke EPF can be used is only 88 mm, but especially wide freeride skis with a center width of 115 mm and more should benefit from the increase in width. This shows that this is a strongly downhill-oriented binding that is suitable for ascents.

Since March 2012, the binding has collected a good 15 freeride days in test operation, mostly in terrain accessed by lifts, although some ascents up to 1000 meters in altitude were also included in the program. The downhill-oriented freeride days went to our complete satisfaction. The touring days, on the other hand, went as expected with a lot of uphill sweat with the heavy binding on our feet.

Positives

The most noticeable change in the Duke EPF compared to the previous models, apart from the design, is the increased width. Another positive aspect is the more comfortable operation of the climbing aids. A gentle push or pull of the pole and you are in the desired step of the climbing aid. The climbing aid can be operated quickly with the tip of the pole and then with the pole plate to the highest climbing level. You can return just as quickly and easily using the pole plate.

gear reviews
presented by

The increased width of the drill holes and the frame construction initially has a positive effect on the rider's psyche. The wider construction conveys safety! The riding impression - tested with alternating alpine ski boots and touring soles - is consistent with this initial feeling. This Duke does not need to shy away from comparison with full metal racing bindings. Unfortunately, we were unable to test whether the Duke EPF is stiffer in the laboratory, but the practical test is impressive. Nothing wobbles, the thing simply sits bombproof with the adjustable front glide plate.

Another positive aspect is that the weight of the Duke EPF has remained the same compared to the previous model. Of course, the total weight will still make you break out in a sweat when you think about a 1000-metre climb, but you won't have to make any compromises on the descent. So you'll have to bite the bullet on this one.
The PG editorial team also rates the inclusion of an assembly template positively. Equipped with a drill and binding drill, the binding can be fitted at home in just a few minutes. This saves time and money for interested users who prefer to assemble their bindings on their own.

Negatives

Anything to do with climbing remains negative with the Duke. The continued high weight is noticeable both on flat stages and on steeper "hike"terrain. Due to the design, the fact that you have to get out of the binding between ascent and descent mode is also still negative.

Steep, hard traverses in touring mode are still not the Duke EPF's favorite terrain. The climbing aid then slips around uncomfortably in the guide. After 5 tours, one (unimportant) piece of plastic broke off. The Duke EPF still has to prove its durability with increased touring use (over 20-30 tours per season).

Conclusion

As a trend athlete, you should always approach new products with caution when it comes to overly sophisticated product names. In the case of the Duke EPF and the "Extended Powder Frame", however, a major step forward in downhill suitability has indeed been achieved. Only the endurance test can clarify whether this leap is worth the surcharge between an "old" Duke (on sale) and a new Duke EPF at 379.95 euros. The new model also retains its weakness on the climbs. The downhill performance has improved once again, especially with very wide freeride skis. We are particularly looking forward to a direct comparison between the new Duke EPF, the Salomon Guardian/Atomic Tracker and the Tyrolia AAA. More on this in winter 2012/13.

Editor's note: We tested a prototype of the Duke EPF, which, according to Marker, did not yet correspond to the series in a few points and therefore contained some negative points. We will check these explicitly with a production model and update the article.

Photo gallery

This article has been automatically translated by DeepL with subsequent editing. If you notice any spelling or grammatical errors or if the translation has lost its meaning, please write an e-mail to the editors.

Show original (German)

Comments

gear reviews
presented by