Skip to content

Cookies 🍪

This site uses cookies that need consent.

Learn more

Zur Powderguide-Startseite Zur Powderguide-Startseite
gear of the week

Gear of the Week | Mammut Alugator and Carbon Probe 240 Light

What can the lightweight shovel and the carbon probe do?

by Philip Crivelli 02/18/2017
The basic safety equipment - avalanche transceiver, shovel and probe - is preached like a mantra in every avalanche course. Of the three, the avalanche transceiver is given a lot of attention, while the shovel and probe are overshadowed. It's long past time that PowderGuide took a closer look at these products.

If you want to ski in unsecured terrain, an avalanche transceiver, avalanche shovel and avalanche probe belong in your backpack, even before sausage and bread. Anyone who has attended an avalanche course understands that it is vital to rescue buried victims as quickly as possible. The avalanche transceiver is used to roughly locate a buried victim, the probe for precise location and the shovel for rescue. Experience has shown that shovelling takes the longest for experienced rescuers, especially when the burial depth is more than one meter.

It is therefore logical that the main focus of an assessment of shovels and probes is on their efficiency in terms of avalanche rescue. In times of 'Fast and Light' alpinism, another criterion for evaluating the set is weight. As the name suggests, the Mammut set discussed here is on the light side.

The shovel

Unlike what you would expect from a 'light' shovel, the Mammut shovel is not made of carbon or plastic, but as the name suggests, of aluminum. Therefore, at 470g (manufacturer's specification 460g), it is significantly heavier than a carbon shovel, as is common in ski touring (approx. 250g). Nevertheless, it is almost 300g lighter than my old shovel (G3 Avitech)!

Lighter is already a good thing. The question now is what that means in terms of safety. A large part of the weight saving comes from the size of the blade. Compared to the G3 shovel, the Mammut shovel is much smaller (see picture 3). In addition, the blade has several holes and is structured. In my opinion, the holes make no sense except for weight optimization. The structure, on the other hand, gives the shovel additional strength, so that the choice of thinner (lighter) material is justified. Theoretically, you can move more mass with the same number of movements with a larger blade. However, this also means more force is required per movement. This raises the question of whether it might be more efficient for less powerful people to remove a smaller mass of snow per shovel stroke?

An additional feature that makes the Mammut shovel efficient is the oval handle. This means that it does not twist when pulled apart and the metal nipples of the holder engage automatically and reliably. In addition, the handle mount on the shovel blade is shaped in such a way that the handle can be easily retracted without pressing the metal nipple. This can be a great advantage when operating the shovel with gloves and under stress.

In terms of price, the shovel is in the mid-range.

Advantages & disadvantages
+ Weight
+ Operation
+ Workmanship
- Small shovel blade

Details
- Weight 470g (manufacturer 460g)
- Length 75cm
- Handle length 37cm
- Shovel size 21x24cm
- Price 65.00 €

Here is the Mammut homepage of the shovel

gear of the week
presented by

The probe

Carbon is a more widely used material for probes. Compared to the blade, I don't see any safety-relevant disadvantages with probes, as there are usually no loads acting on the probe that would be critical for the carbon material (especially compared to thin aluminum). The advantages of carbon therefore come into their own here. At 175g, the Mammut probe is around 80g lighter than an aluminum probe of the same length (like a bar of chocolate). The Mammut probe also scores highly in terms of processing. Fixing the probe does not require any additional handles and simply clicks into place or can be released again very easily. In addition, the length information is clearly visible in white lettering on the black carbon, which can be a great advantage when hitting a probe.

In addition to the weight, the difference between the aluminum and carbon probe is particularly noticeable in the price. Compared to the aluminum version, the carbon probe is almost half the price. Compared to the competition in carbon probes, the Mammut version is in the midfield.

Advantages and disadvantages
+ Weight
+ Processing
+ Operation
- Price

Details
- Weight 175g (manufacturer 185g)
- Length 240cm
- Length folded 38cm
- Price 85.00 €

Here is the Mammut homepage for the probe

Conclusion:

The combination of the Mammut Alugator Light shovel and Carbon Probe Light compared to my old shovel and probe reduces the weight in my backpack by almost 360g. As mentioned at the beginning, the main criterion for evaluating a shovel and probe is efficiency in the event of an avalanche burial. In my opinion, both products perform very well. Only the shovel raises the question of whether a larger blade would make more sense. However, I cannot answer this question with a clear yes, it would depend on a test. For me, the advantages of weight savings and good workmanship clearly outweigh the disadvantages.

In my opinion, it is important for safety that an avalanche shovel is made of metal and not plastic or carbon if you seriously want to use it to rescue someone from an avalanche. Anyone who has ever shoveled in an avalanche deposit will know how much snow can compact. In my opinion, plastic or carbon shovels are not strong enough to withstand the forces involved in shoveling in avalanche snow. So steer clear of plastic and carbon shovels if you are not at the start of a ski touring race.

This article has been automatically translated by DeepL with subsequent editing. If you notice any spelling or grammatical errors or if the translation has lost its meaning, please write an e-mail to the editors.

Show original (German)

Related articles

Comments

gear of the week
presented by