PG: Moritz, are winter sports, as they are practiced today, still up to date?
MN: Good question. I have to answer in the negative. Many ski resorts still refuse to acknowledge and accept the problem, but on the other hand there are many, many positive examples. That's why I think that winter sports are, by and large, in keeping with the times.
I believe that a lot depends on the community itself and that we as end consumers and end users need to take a good look at ourselves and inform ourselves. After all, 70 percent of emissions on a conventional ski day are caused by the journey to and from the resort. And it is simply up to us to get to the ski resorts as publicly as possible. Then skiing won't be nearly as harmful as many people think.
Would you, like the DAV, advocate taking longer vacations in the mountains and doing fewer day trips?
Definitely. I don't have the figures off the top of my head, but I recently saw an interesting statistic where overnight stays in Tyrol have risen by 6 percent overall since 2005, but arrivals and departures by day tourists have risen by over 20 percent. This shows that vacations are getting shorter and shorter and people are simply going back and forth much more often. The one-week family ski vacation is apparently becoming less and less common.
Would you say that winter sports are endangered to a certain extent?
Winter sports are clearly endangered. You only need to look at the figures: If we carry on as we are, there will only be 50 percent of glaciers left in Austria by the year 2100. It will only be a matter of time before they are all gone. One ski resort in Lower Austria should have been closed by now because the snow is no longer guaranteed and it is no longer profitable, as artificial snow can no longer be produced in the warm temperatures. Countries and regions such as Austria, Switzerland, South Tyrol and southern Germany must be interested in stopping this development. Austria in particular, as the skiing nation par excellence, must set a good example. This starts with those who are directly affected - ski resorts and the industry.
Is that also the reason why Protect our Winters is committed to the future of winter sports?
We are not entirely altruistic and naturally also want to protect winter because we want to protect our favorite hobbies. We all love skiing and snowboarding and we want to be able to offer this to our children and grandchildren.
What are the specific goals of POW Austria in this regard? In the past, we mainly wanted to create awareness, which in concrete terms means that each and every individual can contribute something. We have now moved on to political campaigns and there are still some major decisions to be made that affect the Austrian federal government. The eco-social tax reform with a CO2 tax is currently being discussed, as is the Austrian Climate Protection Act, which has been pending for over a year because it expired in 2020. This law will also create the necessary framework conditions for our work.
Our concrete measures include, for example, an open letter in which we have collected signatures from almost all relevant companies in the winter sports industry, from Kästle to Atomic, Fischer, Hagan, Scarpa Austria, Blue Tomato and Burton, and in which we jointly demand an ambitious climate protection target from the federal government. First and foremost, at least a 65 percent reduction in CO2 emissions by 2030 as an interim target, in order to actually become climate-neutral by 2040, as the government has planned. This is of course a welcome and very ambitious goal for the government, but it is nowhere near achievable with the current measures.