Skip to content

Cookies 🍪

This site uses cookies that need consent.

Learn more

Zur Powderguide-Startseite Zur Powderguide-Startseite
gear reviews

Gear reviews | Phantom Alpha

The first complete binding system for hardboot splitboarders

by Jonathan Kampmann 12/18/2016
If you delve a little deeper into the subject of splitboarding, you will inevitably come across people who splitboard with ski touring boots: "The dark side of snowboarding", so few people that they practically form their own minority in the already small community of splitboarders.

"The dark side of snowboarding".

But why do we do this at all?

The reasons lie on the one hand in improved ascent performance and on the other in advantages for alpine-oriented destinations. There are currently two corresponding systems, one from Spark R&D and the other from Phantom Splitboard Bindings. I would like to share my experiences with the Phantom Alpha with you in this article.

Background:

Phantom Splitboard Bindings was founded by John Keffler and Barrows Worm de Geldern in Denver, Colorado. Their initial goal was not to start a company, but to use their skills (snowboarding experience combined with expertise in material properties and the construction of extremely specialized components) to solve what they saw as a pressing problem. Until then, there was no well-tuned hardboot binding for splitboarders. They then tackled this problem alongside their main job with a great deal of passion and expertise. The result is the Phantom Alpha.

gear reviews
presented by

The binding is designed so that it can be installed on the existing inserts of a finished splitboard without additional holes. The two Dynafit Superlight Toepieces are supplied with corresponding adapter plates and form a complete and independent setup with the other parts.

Tester and test conditions

I have been snowboarding since 1998 and have mainly been touring since 2007. In the beginning I used snowshoes, then in January 2011 I bought my first splitboard (Burton Freebird). The following year a Spark Burner, soon with Spark XV boots, which (with the strappy straps for better lateral support) is my reference soft boot setup. My downhill position is +18° at the front and -6° at the back with 57 cm clearance.

I don't like to use the lift, instead I ski most of the vertical meters that I ski up the mountain under my own steam, on average it's around 1300-1700 m per tour. In terms of snow types, I've really had everything from powder to heavy slush to rock-hard frozen slopes. I noticed the higher weight and poorer edge hold in hard snow as a disadvantage of the soft boot system. That's why I made the switch in winter 2014/2015. I've been using the Phantom Alpha (from the 14/15 season) in combination with a modified Scott Orbit II (more information here: http://www.erstespur.de/viewtopic.php?t=6395) and on the Burton Freebird 162, Jones Hovercraft 160 and Amplid LabCarbon Split 162 snowboards.

Uphill and downhill performance

Uphill, you only have advantages with ski touring boots, so-called AT (alpine touring) boots, and a pin binding. The pivot point is further forward, which feels much more intuitive when walking. In addition, the better lateral support of the boots effectively transfers the pressure to the edge, which pays off with better edge hold, especially in hard snow conditions. Finally, you don't carry the binding on your feet up the mountain, but in your backpack, and this is noticeable: the rule of thumb here is that saving 100 grams on your feet feels roughly the same as having 700 - 1000 grams less in your backpack. The "Rocket Riser" climbing aids are two-stage, absolutely minimalist and work perfectly. In contrast to soft boots, you can use the ski touring boots to climb steps in hard snow, mount stable crampons and climb much better on rock thanks to the stiff sole.

On reaching the summit, the true face of an AT boot setup becomes apparent: it also has to be good downhill. The binding plate is placed on the board, twisted and fixed to the two cleats with two movable pins. On a few days each season, you notice the only disadvantage of the system: compared to the Voilé system, it is not self-cleaning, which means you have to remove frozen snow beforehand so that the binding lies flat on the topsheet and the pins can snap into the recesses. However, with a small ice scraper or an old bank card, this has never been a problem. The cleats can be infinitely adjusted from -30° to +30° binding angle. The Phantom Alpha holds the ski touring boot firmly in place and is quick to open. It is basically a classic stirrup binding, with the advantages of a low mounting height and built-in canting so that you can stand more comfortably on the snowboard.

Advantages and disadvantages

+ Outstanding quality of components
+ Reliable
+ No breaking plastic parts
+ Significantly improved ascent performance compared to a soft boot setup
+ Unrestricted crampon compatibility
+ Lighter than a soft boot setup, especially on the ascent

- Cost-intensive (850 USD + shipping from the USA)
- Icing possible, but easy to fix
- Adjustment necessary on the descent

The right ski touring boots

In addition to the bindings, the decisive factor for downhill performance is an appropriately functioning and fitting ski touring boot. That's enough material for a separate article, but a few points first: the lighter the boots, the softer they usually are. Carbon may be fashionable, but in this case it is counterproductive as it makes the flex significantly harder. The shoe must then allow it to flex forwards. To do this, you often have to modify the shoes, for some models like the TLT6 there are great instructions, my last mod on the Scott Orbit also works well.

Attention: there are now shoes like the TLT7 or the Arcteryx Procline that have no or too narrow a sole edge at the toe. These do not fit in a stirrup binding! In general, the same recommendation applies as always when buying (ski) boots: get detailed advice in a specialist store, explain what you want to use the boot for, have the boot fitted and then buy it there too.

Conclusion

If the boot meets the required criteria and you allow a few days to get used to the new setup, you will get a functioning system. Although the Phantom Alpha has a high purchase price, it is the best currently available on the market in terms of function, weight and quality. After two winters with the system, the experiment has been a success for me personally, and I see the future of snowboard mountaineering in the combination of suitable ski touring boots with a well-matched binding system.

For more information

I recommend the Phantom website www.phantomsnow.com as well as a highly recommended review in English including weight specifications: http://snowboardmountaineer.com/gear-review-phantom-splitboard-bindings/.

The two splitboard-specific forumswww.erstespur.de and www.splitboard.com contain a lot of good information about splitboarding. In the forums (my username is mgco3) you can also find the test report on the Scott Orbit as a suitable ski touring boot for wide feet.

Here you can find the PG test guidelines.

Photo gallery

This article has been automatically translated by DeepL with subsequent editing. If you notice any spelling or grammatical errors or if the translation has lost its meaning, please write an e-mail to the editors.

Show original (German)

Related articles

Comments

gear reviews
presented by