Test setup and first impression
According to the manufacturer, the Crux 93 is an "all-mountain touring ski" and can do everything everywhere, uphill and downhill on the piste and when exploring the backcountry in "extreme conditions". In other words, it is a versatile freeride touring ski that can actually do quite a lot. More of an all-round talent than a specialist for special applications, but that usually makes more sense for ski touring. Apart from that, Head also offers the Crux with 81, 87 and 99 mm waist width, as well as the significantly lighter but also significantly more expensive "Pro" version.
I ski the Head Crux 93 in 184 cm length with a Plum Karibou binding and Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro boots. In addition to the Crux, I've mainly used a Blizzard Zero G 95 and an older Down Low Down 102 for touring over the last three seasons. Comparative impressions therefore relate primarily to these two alternative skis. I've used the Crux this season in a variety of conditions, from rocky powder to rutted slopes. Unfortunately, due to the poor snow conditions, there were fewer touring days than I had hoped for, but the Crux 93 was also used on the piste.
The Head Crux 93 with Plum bindings is slightly heavier than my Zero G with ATK bindings, but slightly lighter than the LowDown with Dynafit bindings. According to the manufacturer, the Crux 93 in the 184 cm length weighs 1,600 grams. Subjectively, the head setup falls into my mental category of "not ultra-light, but pretty light for the dimensions of the ski". Ten years ago, the weight would probably have been even more impressive given the solid handling characteristics, but as we all know, a lot has happened in the so-called freeride touring segment in recent years, and weight requirements have shifted accordingly. There's not much else to say about the first impression: the topsheet design is as simple as a laminate floor.